Home > AGW, Climate Change, Global Warming, Omniclimate, Skepticism > Gnostepistemological Critique of Anthropogenic Global Warming

Gnostepistemological Critique of Anthropogenic Global Warming

gnosis: the direct experiential knowledge of the supernatural or divine
epistemology: the branch of philosophy that studies the nature, methods, limitations, and validity of knowledge and belief

What an amazing coincidence…

In our day and age: just as soon as we have managed to build the FIRST computers able to provide plausible estimates of future climates; and just as soon as we have launched the FIRST satellites to observe the evolution of polar ice and the Earth’s atmosphere as a whole…it is RIGHT NOW that we have discovered Global Warming and/or Climate Change. And it is RIGHT NOW that we have to undergo major social and personal upheavals, during the upcoming few years, otherwise the planet will be in peril.

An incredible stroke of luck? Way too many well-minded people trying to make use of just-acquired knowledge, in an evermore “medicalized” society built around narrow technical expertise?

Or perhaps, the definitive proof of Providence, and therefore of God.

Amen.

(many thanks to geoff chambers for reminding me of this post I had written last August, but only in Italian)

Advertisements
  1. 2008/11/12 at 12:26

    I don’t think they’re afraid…it’s just that they don’t get covered in newsstories, and there’s no space for them on Nature or Science (for obvious reasons). I’ll soon blog about one of them, and an AGW believer at that

  2. geoff chambers
    2008/11/12 at 11:50

    p.s. Seriously, your point (which I thought was mine) opens up a potentially important debate in the sociology of science. The fact that an idea arrives when it’s technically possible to test it (and make a successful career out of doing so) doesn’t in itself prove that the idea is false. But when that idea is poorly argued, and enters the political domain, it’s necessary to examine its socio-cultural roots, including, I would think, the motivations of its proponents. And this isn’t happening, as far as I know, except for a lot of scattered name-calling and some decent socio-political analysis on Climate Resistance (where they refuse to discuss motivation). Where are the historians, philosophers, psychologists and other cultural commentators? Are they afraid of men in labcoats who do statistics?

  3. geoff chambers
    2008/11/10 at 19:28

    When I posted my comment I swear I hadn’t read your post. I do read Italian, but I didn’t know I could telepathise too.
    Ci son più cose in cielo e in terra, Orazio,
    che non sogni la tua filosofia

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: